Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and StandardsĬhange color or shape of individual data point in control chartĮlaborating a control chart with skewed data What kind of chart to detect WHEN a in-process NC is about to occur? Need help / feedback on Xbar/R charts and Cpk/Ppk applicability - AssembliesĬapability index for one-sided specification? Cpk(max) = (USL-Xbar)/3*s ? xls Spreadsheet Templates and Toolsĭoes anyone use Median Charts instead of Xbar & R charts? xls form and SPC Xbar and R template (lost it. Gage R&R Methods - ANOVA, AIAG, 6sigma Xbar/R, GM - Which to Use Normality Test Before the Xbar R Diagram is Made? Variable sample size - Xbar-s charts - How to select A3 and B4Ĭalculation of UCL and LCL for SPC charts (Xbar-s) with sub-group sample of 32 pcs. Why is Cpk = lower of (USL-Xbar)/3sig & (Xbar-LSL)/3sig ? What should I use for Variable Sample with Size 3, 4, and 5 - xbar-R or xbar-S?Ĭontrol limit calculation (Xbar R charts) using Minitab Should I use Grand Mean or Target Value as the CL for Xbar-R, MA, CUSUM? My Spread Calcs/Results for Xbar R Charts not Matching Minitab's Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) How to decide on a sampling size for Xbar-R charts Minitab GRR crossed Xbar and r method macro needed IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard IATF16949 audit requirement - Auditor request UCL and LCL must be show Xbar-R, ![]() Seeking: Control Charts - Xbar R control chart Removing the effect of special causes on Xbar-R chart - Centerless grinding process Xbar-R chart question - Wire Pull Test - Different Wire Sizes Variables control chart (XBar & R) template needed Xbar/R control chart help (possibly a simple question) Xbar - R Control Chart taking into account the Probability Limit Xbar-R Chart better than Xbar-S Chart when the subgroup size is small - Why?Ĭapability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. Taking samples in a 100 cavity mold for Xbar-R chart XBar & R Chart Spreadsheet to apply a Control Process ![]() Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC What is the Beta RISK for S chart OF XBAR-S chart If the process is non-homogenous (has assignable causes) teh control limits calculated by the last two methods will be too large and all of the variation will lie within the limits. This is why the control limits for the Xbar chart are calculated from the within subgroup variation (either the Range or the standard deviation) and NOT by calculating the standard deviation fo subgroup averages directly from the subgroup averages Or even by calculating the total standard deviation from all of the individual values and then dividing by the square root of teh sample size. The relationship is that the standard deviation of sample (or subgroup) averages is equal to the total standard deviation of all of the individual values divided by the square root of the sample size. A homogenous process has a very specific mathematical relationship that is at the heart of almost all statistical analysis (ANOVA, t-tests, tests of means). A ‘statistically stable’ process is defined in SPC as one that is homogenous. I will elaborate on the ‘mistake proofing’ comment from Miner In case you want to have a deeper understanding.Ĭontrol charts are designed to detect non-homogeneity. But in recent years I've shifted over to using the Range rather than swim against the tide.Įxcellent responses by Miner and Steve (as always). Very rarely (I'd say less than 5% of the time) did it make a real difference - that is an actual point that would have been outside of three standard deviations with one method would not be using the other. I tend to be a proponent of using sigma, and spent a year studying if there was a difference between using sigma or range in my operational charts done on the job. ![]() Also the moving range / R chart can detect changes / dependencies from point to point since it maintains the time sequence where sigma does not maintain the time sequence. Pros for using range - an outlier will much more effect the sigma formula (since the difference is squared) rather than the range formula which is only the difference. Pros for using sigma - it is the maximum likelihood, unbaised (if you use n-1 in the divisor) estimator. Wheeler and others still prefers to use the Range formulae, which oddly is now HARDER in Excel spreadsheet to calculate than just using the stdev formula. One could make an Xbar-S chart analogous to the Xbar-R charts. Yes, originally the various factors were developed for estimating the standard deviation from the range values (which don't involve a square or square root). Shewhart did state that the best estimator for the standard deviation is the standard deviation formula which involves the sum of the square of the difference between the x values and the mean.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |